Merciful verse of the Qur’an 5:33.
Daniel talks to Dawah people about s5:32 and s5:33.
Sura 5:32 (Sahih International) “Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”
Surah 5:33 (Sahih International) “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment”
To support the work of DCCI https://paypal.me/dcciministries0717
I don’t know how Satan cunningly makes the Non-Moslems difficult to compare two verses Q.5, v.32-33, but for us Moslems, it is clearly how verse Q.5, v.33 has a non-lethal non-deadly bloodless penalty, i.e. banishment (exile or imprisonment), which we counted as a reduction of a lethal, deadly, bloody penalty from Talmud which is reinstated in Q.5, v.32. Both verses have same cause or same case: a crime of making a corruption on the land (against the Law of Land).
On the invoking of curse.
Prophet Muhammad has a personal terms with Allah to disregard his curse.
Muslim 32:6297
…..so for any person from amongst my Ummah whom I curse and he in no way deserves it, let that, O Lord, be made a source of purification and purity and nearness to (Allah) on the Day of Resurrection.
On the Prophet’s repentance.
Everyone (including all Prophets and Jesus) must be unavoidably sinful. In Judaism, it’s called a “sin Inclination”.
Ibn Majah, Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4251
It was narrated from Anas that the Messenger of Allah said: Every son of Adam commits sin, and the best of those who commit sin are those who repent.
Bukhari, Vol. 8, Book 77, Hadith 609
Narrated Ibn `Abbas: I did not see anything so resembling minor sins as what Abu Huraira said from the Prophet, who said, Allah has written for the son of Adam his inevitable share of adultery whether he is aware of it or not: The adultery of the eye is the looking (at something which is sinful to look at), and the adultery of the tongue is to utter (what it is unlawful to utter), and the innerself wishes and longs for (adultery) and the private parts turn that into reality or refrain from submitting to the temptation.
Cursing is akin to pray to God for Himself being the One who does the evil thing on certain people. Islam forbids Moslems from praying to God to become such an evil God upon the people we disliked.
We do not pray to God for Himself being the One who does evilness on people, not even on the evil people. If there are the evil people, we don’t ask God to do any evilness upon them. In fact, it is our Islamic moral duty to punish the evil people. Thus, we rather pray to be given “for ourselves” a strength, a patience, an easiness, and a success to punish and reduce the evil people.
Muslim Book 32, Hadith 6280
It does not seem proper for a Siddiq that he should be an invoker of curse.
On marrying own slaves:
In Islam, having sex is lawful only in marriage.
What is the context of being “lawful” in two verses Q.4, v.23-24? Marriage. Qur’an is proven too much hard and too much sophisticated for the mind and reading comprehension of the lousy infidels, but too easy for the sincere believers: Just as lawful for you to *marry* one’s daughter whose mother is not yet F-ed by you in your marriage (Q.4, v.23), likewise you are lawful to *marry* your own slaves (Q.4, v.24).
Context does matter.
On marrying own slaves:
In Islam, having sex is lawful only in marriage.
What is the context of being “lawful” in two verses Q.4, v.23-24? Marriage. Qur’an is proven too much hard and too much sophisticated for the mind and reading comprehension of the lousy infidels, but too easy for the sincere believers: Just as lawful for you to *marry* one’s daughter whose mother is not yet F-ed by you in your marriage (exception in Q.4, v.23), likewise you are lawful to *marry* your own slaves (exception in Q.4, v.24).
Context does matter.
Qur’anic verse Q.4, v.23 doesn’t make it “lawful” for a man to *fornicate* with his step-daughter whose mother has not yet been F-ed by him.
The context is: he ought to marry his step-daughter (after divorcing her mother).
Likewise, Qur’anic verse Q.4, v.24 doesn’t make it “lawful” for a man to fornicate with his own female slaves.
The context is: he ought to marry them.
If Jesus were an Angel of the LORD, then Jesus must have been the Holy Spirit:
Isa 63:10
But they rebelled, and vexed his holy Spirit: therefore he was turned to be their enemy, and he fought against them.
Jud 2
1 And an angel of the LORD came up from Gilgal to Bochim, and said, I made you to go up out of Egypt, and have brought you unto the land which I sware unto your fathers; and I said, I will never break my covenant with you. 2 And ye shall make no league with the inhabitants of this land; ye shall throw down their altars: but ye have not obeyed my voice: why have ye done this? 3 Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be as thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare unto you.3 Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be as thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare unto you.
If Jesus were the angel bearing God’s name, the Trinitarians must have been the worshiper of a house made by hands and bricks:
Exo 23:21
Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him.
2Chr 20:9
If, when evil cometh upon us, as the sword, judgment, or pestilence, or famine, we stand before this house, and in thy presence, for thy name is in this house, and cry unto thee in our affliction, then thou wilt hear and help.
If Jesus were the visible glory of the LORD, why did he fail to fulfill the Isaiah’s prophesies (which John also repeated) of making the hills and mounts low, and rough places plain?
Isa 40
3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.4 Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low: and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain:5 And the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
If Jesus were the LORD who rides the clouds, then the Trinitarians must have worshiped the angel’s servant, the living saints, as well as two resurrected Prophets:
Daniel’s figure “like” Son of Man (who is a servant of Angel because he obeys the order of the Angel) sits upon the cloud, while the Lamb was still standing on Mount Olivet (Rev 14:1):
Rev 14
14 And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.15 And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe.
The living saints will ascend on the cloud:
1Th 4:17
Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Two resurrected Prophets will ascend on the cloud:
Rev 11:12
And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.
If Jesus were the LORD, why will his visible presence on Mount Olivet at his 2nd Coming be not causing the split of land and the fleeing of people?
Zech 14
4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.5 And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.
The split of land will Not be fulfilled by the Lamb. There will happen nothing on the mount Olivet, nor will the huge people’s plight occur, at time of his 2nd Coming:
Rev 14
1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads.2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps:
The coming of God on the great white Throne will do the exact fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophesy:
Rev 20:11
And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
If Jesus were the LORD in the form of angel, why did he refuse to accept the offering of a kid for his eating? even he refused to use his name for the burnt offering, rather he commanded Manoah to offer the sacrifice “in the LORD’s name”, and for the LORD alone.
Moreover, the Burnt offering is for the forgiveness of sins, which only God can grant it.
Jud 13
15 And Manoah said unto the angel of the LORD, I pray thee, let us detain thee, until we shall have made ready a kid for thee. 16 And the angel of the LORD said unto Manoah, Though thou detain me, I will not eat of thy bread: and if thou wilt offer a burnt offering, thou must offer it unto the LORD. For Manoah knew not that he was an angel of the LORD.19 So Manoah took a kid with a meat offering, and offered it upon a rock unto the LORD: and the angel did wondrously; and Manoah and his wife looked on.
If Jesus were the LORD the great “I am”, why do both Moses and Elijah not worship him during the glistering moment of his Transfiguration? Both Prophets rather came down to inform Jesus about certain “future” things at Jerusalem which Jesus didn’t know of.
Lk 9
29 And as he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered, and his raiment was white and glistering.30 And, behold, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elias:31 Who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease which he should accomplish at Jerusalem.
If Jesus were self-making himself a God, why does Jesus use Psalms 82:6 (for the false gods and dead deities) to argue for his typical divinity? Indeed, Jesus was slain just like men and princes.
Jesus makes himself on a par with the false gods, thus he is not one with the living immortal LORD.
Ps 82:6
I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
Jn 10
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. 34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
If Jesus were a God simply because his Father is the immortal LORD, or that he were one with the immortal LORD, why does Jesus argue with the most weakest and self-defeated reasoning ever in the Bible, i.e. the death of the Father’s son?
Jn 10
17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. 18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
If Jesus were the LORD who owned all things, and was given all thing, why does Jesus not find any pillow at all just to lay down his head to fall asleep?
Lk 9:58
And Jesus said unto him, Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
If Jesus were the LORD who never dies, why does Jesus use the great name “I am” for his resurrection, which means the “I am” needs to be “dead” first?
Jn 11:25
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Rev 1:18
I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.
If Jesus were the LORD, why does he fail to tell and inform certain important things which the Disciples can’t hear and bear, but weirdly he chooses to an unreasonable way of handing over those valuable words, so ironically, to the Spirit whose voices can’t be heard by the normal ears, and physical form can’t be seen by the normal eyes?
Jn 16
12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. 13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
Rom 8:26
Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
If Jesus were God the Passover Lamb of redemption, why does Jesus feel the need to eat the Passover lambs annually?
Which sins does he need to atone by eating the Passover lambs?
BTW, as the Rabbis say, just like a “skin covering” for Adam and Eve after getting naked and sinned, the sacrificial rite of the Passover lambs simply in a limited way covers the Jews from the death, but not further for atoning the sins of Jews.
Neither did the skin cover atone or take away the sins of Adam and Eve, nor do the Passover lambs take away the sins of the Jews.
If Jesus were God, why does he challenge the people to sinfully tempt God by letting themselves slain physically (which means they also commit a sin of killing their souls thru the devilish temptation)?
Mt 4:7
Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
Versus:
Mt 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
If Jesus were God, why does he order the Jews to pay “tithes” to the Lordship of Caesar (Roman Imperial cult), by making the Jews as his financial benefactors?
Lk 22
25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. 26 But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.
Versus:
Lk 20:25
And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar’s, and unto God the things which be God’s.
Also other duty of paying tithes:
Rom 13:6
For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
If Jesus were God, why does he erroneously attribute the “abiogenesis” to Abraham (raising up the stones to be Abraham’s “sons”) rather than to be the “sons of God”?
Lk 3:8
Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
Is Jesus a Calvinist God or not?
If Jesus were Calvinist “I am”, why will he judge the people by the works instead of Faith Alone?
Rev 2:23
And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.
How is it possible for Calvinists that Jesus will remove the election of the elects because of their works? Calvinists are not the sure elect?
Rev 2:5
Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.
How is it possible for Calvinists that Jesus will blot out the elect’s name because of their works? Calvinists are not the sure elect?
Rev 3:5
He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
Original Gospel will be one in multi-lingual, not in a Greek alone.
Rev 14:6
And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,
Why does al-Quran describe marriage in heaven but other holy books say otherwise there will be no marriage in heaven?
That is not the way of seducing the believers with the low physical pleasures or with vulgarity. It is important to note that the Arabic word “Nikah” in Islam can be translated loosely as marriage, betrothal, family relation, even Platonic friendship without romantic contact.
In the Gospels, there’s a different emphasis in eating (due to dire hungers and extreme poverty under the vile Roman suppression), to the weird extent of the figurative eating of “flesh” and “blood” of a Bridegroom by the Bride (so actually it is wedding scene, or family ties), but nobody accuses it of being a desire of “Cannibalism” by new romantic couples.
Also there’s depiction of eating Supper on the heavenly table and drinking the intoxicant wine lavishly, as if heavens were about eating endlessly for the hungry ones.
Moreover, in Judaism, there’s such different emphasis on boy’s private organ (circumcision on 8th days old boys), yet nobody accuses the practice of being an early “child abuse”.
So, the implementation of marriage (Nikah) by Quran for Heaven is up to the choices of the believers themselves, whether as romantic ties, or betrothal, or just Platonic family.
Quran describes further the physical breasts and condition of hymens of the Houris for the more “greater” purposes:
(i) The depiction of the Houri’s breasts is not for vulgarity, but it is intended by God the Creator to illustrate that the Houri is suitably ripe in her age for love, i.e. after puberty, not as the underage girl.
Islam is not religion for paedophilia. This is important, Islamic Heaven is not for the predators and perverts.
Islam is the religion that protects women and children. Other societies do not have the concept of Age of Puberty for marriage, so predators and perverts live roaming freely to hurt the children among the callous society, whereas the victims of paedophilia live in a perpetual sadness due to traumatised childhood.
(ii) The depiction of the Houri’s hymen is important because it symbolises the good fine healthiness of women.
Many mammals also have similar foreskin for their males and the hymens for their females.
The male’s foreskins and female hymens have contrary functions: In humans (also in male mammals), the foreskin should be cut off for a hygiene reason, because the germs and bacteria can live under the man’s wet skin, whereas in the woman (also in female mammals) her hymen needs to be preserved intact for a similar hygiene reason, that is, to prevent or reduce the easier intrusion of unhealthy germs and infectious bacterial objects into the women’s wet cavity.
(iii) Qur’an also depicts the young servants like pearls (as metallic elements) which can be understood by the Modern people as robotic servants or AI humanoid machines.
They are juvenile (meaning that those humanoid robots are civilian, obedient, programmable and multitasking with learning machines), and importantly like kids they can’t harm the people (they can’t use weapon).
Jesus practiced his Yoga version: sitting alone on own bump for 6-12 hours on mountain:
Lk 6:12
And it came to pass in those days, that he went out into a mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God.
Mt 14:23
And when he had sent the multitudes away, he went up into a mountain apart to pray: and when the evening was come, he was there alone.
Jesus really ends the enmity or just continues it? Jesus prohibits a friendship between Christians and the world.
Jas 4:4
Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
2Cor 6:17
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,
1Cor 5:13
Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Eph 5:
7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them. 11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
2Jn 1:10
If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
The main reason for expecting, hoping, believing and doing in Islam.
I don’t understand the real reason why there’s such a “hatred without a cause” and accumulation of the “personal” hatred by the Non-Moslems on our Prophet Muhammad. Why do they hate him so much? Suppose that Prophet Muhammad lived so holy in an angelic life like that of Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Antiwar groups, et cetera, yet we Moslems ourselves would eventually use the force to establish the Shari’ah Law.
Why do the Non-Moslems still not get it? Why is it too hard for the Non-Moslems to understand a basic thing? Our blessed Prophet Muhammad can’t make us Moslems, not even his families, not even other Prophets, also not even his own self (who is our “Uswa Hasana”), to enter the Heaven, not even after we mimicked him perfectly 1000%.
Prophet Muhammad is not our real reason why we Moslems worship Allah, love Allah, and hope for Heaven. Allah is our reason.
Prophet Muhammad is not our real reason why we Moslems have to use the necessary law-enforcement to punish the criminals, such as blasphemers and mockers. Allah is our reason.
Prophet Muhammad is not our real reason why we Moslems have to “enslave” the criminals by banishing them into prisons for the crimes they did. Allah is.
Prophet Muhammad is not our real reason why we Moslems have to impose the taxation on the People of the Scriptures. Allah is.
Prophet Muhammad is not our real reason why we Moslems have to pray, to go Hajj, to do fasting, to give charity, to preach Islam, to have faith in Monotheism, to forgive, to love, et cetera. Allah is.
Concerning the physical pleasures in Heaven, each dweller of Heavens will have whatever he and she wants, including the form of family:
-The companionship by a group of the beautiful Houris whose skin is so fresh (so that her marrow can be seen under her bone) is just the “gift” from Allah.
Yet, one can prefer to live (even without sexual contact) in Heavens with one platonic wife, so that the rest of Houris will just accompany them as their mutual friends.
– The coronation by wearing the “Gold cloth” and the luxurious crowns is the gift from Allah.
Yet, one is able to prefer to wear a simple piece of cloth of the white linen instead.
– The provision of eating both fowls’ flesh and fishes’ livers is the gift from Allah.
Yet one can prefer to just eat the breads, milk and honey instead.
– The residence in the palace, mansion, and upon the flying throne is the gift from Allah.
Yet one can prefer to live in a garden of flowers instead.
So, there’s no “obligation” (let alone the enforcement with a penalty if it’s not) to enjoy the abundant pleasures of Heaven. Why? Because the will of each believer is and will be the final decision therein.
Enjoying the abundant pleasure of Heavens which will be given by Allah as the “gifts” for Moslems is not counted as a “commandment”, not as the obligation with penalty.
The dazzling depiction of the luxurious lives in Heaven is meant to make the Non-Moslems jealous or envious. And unfortunately, at certain cases (on the “mentally” sick hateful Non-Moslems), that works.
When did the Creation begin in Islam?
In Islam there are two Genesises: Preexistence Epoch and Existence Epoch.
Several thousand years before the first Big Bang (Existence Epoch), Allah already created “Preexistence Epoch” in the soul or spirit, by reciting Qur’an. *Before* those years, Allah had not created any preexistence yet.
During the Preexistence Epoch (about several thousand years before the world began):
– Allah has in His mind to have 114 Surahs of Qur’an, also the verses about the creation of Throne, Lauh Mahfuz, the Heavenly Pen, 7 Heavens, and importantly Sura Al Fatiha.
– Allah has in His mind to create the angels, Adam (in soul yet, as well as Eve’s and their children’s souls), Satan, and the forbidden tree.
– Allah has in His mind to create all Prophets, including Jesus, and Prophet Muhammad.
– Allah has in His mind to create 3 groups in accordance to Sura Al-Fatiha: the believers, the strayed ones, the angered ones.
– Allah has in His mind to create the Holy Spirit who can only afford to indwell the believer’s soul, but can’t afford to indwell the unbelievers, thus he is not omnispresent.
Would Christians call the Islamic Paradise as “brothel”?
The choice of word “slut” or ‘orgy”or “brothel” is not appropriate, even shamelessly a throwback against Christians themselves because Mary (Jesus’ mother) will be chosen to be a wife – also Houri – of Prophet Muhammad in Paradise.