Is Bukhari historically trustworthy?

1 thought on “Is Bukhari historically trustworthy?”

1. Today we have eye-witnesses of President Trump working for the Russians. And we have people who were abducted by space aliens. Traffic cameras are pretty reliable, more than people with a political motive. What about the drift in the meaning of words? Fifty years ago, the word “gay” meant something very different than it does today. Was there an Arabic dictionary in the days of Bukhari?

   Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.